MATRILINEAL GENETIC DIVERSITY AND FORENSIC CHARACTERISATION OF HAUSA POPULATION IN NIGERIA
dc.contributor.author | SHEHU, IBRAHIM EL-LADAN | |
dc.contributor.author | KUMAR, DR. GAURAV | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-08T09:31:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-08T09:31:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-06 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://10.10.11.6/handle/1/17695 | |
dc.description | Table of Contents Contents Candidate’s Declaration ................................................................................................................ ii Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... iii Dedication....................................................................................................................................... vi Acknowledgement ........................................................................................................................ vii Approval Sheet .............................................................................................................................. xi Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................... xii Statement of Thesis Preparation ................................................................................................ xvi List of Publications ..................................................................................................................... xvii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................ xviii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ xxi List of Terms and Abbreviations .............................................................................................. xxii CHAPTER ONE ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………1 to 59 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW ......................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY ................................................................................. 1 1.1.1 RESEARCH PROBLEMS/GAPS ................................................................................ 4 1.1.2 AIM OF THE STUDY .................................................................................................. 6 1.1.3 THE OBJECTIVES ARE TO: ..................................................................................... 6 1.1.4 SCOPE OF THE STUDY ............................................................................................. 6 1.1.5 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY ............................................................................. 7 1.2 LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................. 8 1.2.1 THE WHOLE GENOME OF THE MITOCHONDRIA (MITOGENOME) ............. 8 1.2.2 MITOCHONDRIAL MUTATION .......................................................................... 9 1.2.3 MITOCHONDRIAL HETEROPLASMY ............................................................ 10 1.2.4 MITOCHONDRIAL INHERITANCE .................................................................. 11 1.2.5 MtDNA PHYLOGENY ........................................................................................... 12 1.2.6 MtDNA DATABASES ............................................................................................ 13 1.2.6.1 EDNAP MtDNA Database (EMPOP) ................................................................ 15 1.2.6.2 Human Mitochondrial DNA (mtDB; http://www.mtdb.igp.uu.se/) ................ 16 xiii 1.2.6.3 Mitomap (https://www.mitomap.org/MITOMAP)........................................... 17 1.2.6.4 GenBank ............................................................................................................... 17 1.2.6.5 HaploGrep (https://haplogrep.i-med.ac.at/) ...................................................... 18 1.2.6.6 Phylotree ............................................................................................................... 18 1.2.6.7 HmtDB (https://www.hmtdb.uniba.it/) .............................................................. 19 1.2.6.8 MitoMiner ............................................................................................................ 19 1.2.6.9 MitImpact ............................................................................................................. 19 1.2.7 FORENSIC APPLICATIONS OF MTDNA ......................................................... 19 1.2.7.1 SWGDAM Guidance ........................................................................................... 20 1.2.7.2 ISFG Guidance .................................................................................................... 21 1.2.8 INTERESTING HISTORICAL CASES OF MtDNA USAGE ........................... 23 1.2.8.1 Romanov Family Identification .......................................................................... 23 1.2.8.2 RMS Titanic Sinking: 15th April, 1915 .............................................................. 24 1.2.8.3 The King of France Louis XVII (1793-1795) .................................................... 25 1.2.9 POPULATION STUDIES ...................................................................................... 26 1.2.9.1 Archeogenetics ......................................................................................................... 26 1.2.9.2 Phylogeography ................................................................................................... 27 Phylogenetic Tree ................................................................................................................. 27 Median Networks .................................................................................................................. 29 Founder Analysis .................................................................................................................. 30 Molecular Clock ................................................................................................................... 31 1.2.10 AFRICAN ARCHEOGENETICS AND PHYLOGEOGRAPHY ....................... 32 1.2.11 HISTORY OF HUMAN MIGRATION IN AND OUT OF AFRICA................ 36 1.2.11.1 Human Migration in Africa .................................................................................. 36 1.2.11.2 Human migration out of Africa ...................................................................... 38 1.2.12 AFRICAN GENETIC DIVERSITY ...................................................................... 40 1.2.12.1 African mtDNA Diversity and Haplogrouping ................................................. 41 1.2.13 NIGERIA: GEOGRAPHY, DEMOGRAPHY AND ETHNIC POPULATIONS 57 CHAPTER TWO……………………………………………………………………………………………………………60 to 76 2.0 MATERIALS AND METHODS ..................................................................................... 60 2.1 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................... 60 xiv 2.1.1 SAMPLING ................................................................................................................. 61 2.1.2 DNA SAMPLE COLLECTION ................................................................................. 62 2.1.3 DNA EXTRACTION .................................................................................................. 63 2.1.4 DETERMINATION OF NUCLEIC ACID CONCENTRATION AND PURITY USING NANODROP ..................................................................................................... 68 2.1.5 AMPLIFICATION OF THE TARGETED MTDNA USING PCR. ....................... 69 2.1.6 SIZE ESTIMATION AND INTEGRITY CHECK VIA GEL ELECTROPHORESIS 71 2.2 DATA ANALYSIS........................................................................................................... 74 CHAPTER THREE ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….77 to 94 3.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 77 3.2 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................... 79 3.2.1 ETHICS AND CONSENT STATEMENT ............................................................ 79 3.2.2 POPULATION AND SAMPLES ........................................................................... 79 3.2.3 LABORATORY METHODS ................................................................................. 79 3.2.4 DATA ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... 80 3.3 RESULTS ......................................................................................................................... 81 3.3.1 HAPLOGROUPING ............................................................................................... 81 3.3.2 PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS AND POPULATION COMPARISON ........... 86 CHAPTER FOUR ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….95 to 120 4.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 95 4.2 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................... 96 4.2.1 CONSENT AND ETHICAL CLEARANCE ........................................................ 96 4.2.2 SAMPLE POPULATION ....................................................................................... 97 4.2.3 LABORATORY METHODS ................................................................................. 97 4.2.4 DATA ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... 98 4.3 RESULT ........................................................................................................................... 99 4.3.1 HAPLOGROUP ...................................................................................................... 99 4.3.2 POPULATION STRUCTURE AND STRATIFICATION ............................... 102 4.4 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................. 116 4.5 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION ........................................................... 119 CHAPTER FIVE ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….121 to 144 xv 5.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................ 121 5.2 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................ 125 5.3 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................... 126 5.3.1 POPULATION GENETIC STRUCTURE OF THE HVR2 FOR FORENSIC AND POPULATION GENETIC REFERENCE ................................................................ 133 5.4 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................. 141 CHAPTER SIX ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….145 to 161 6.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 145 6.2 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................ 146 6.2.1 CONSENT AND ETHICAL CLEARANCE ...................................................... 146 6.2.2 SAMPLE POPULATION ..................................................................................... 147 6.2.3 LABORATORY METHODS ............................................................................... 147 6.2.4 DATA ANALYSIS ................................................................................................. 148 6.3 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................... 149 6.4 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................. 158 6.7 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................... 161 CHAPTER SEVEN …………………………………………………………………………………………………..162 to 169 7.0 SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PROSPECTIVES ............................ 162 7.1 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION .............................................................................. 162 7.2 RECOMMENDATIONS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS ........................................... 169 References .................................................................................................................................. 171 Paper Publication ...................................................................................................................... 196 Curriculum Vitae ...................................................................................................................... 203 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) plays a crucial role in forensic science and population genetics, providing valuable insights into human evolution, ancestry, and disease susceptibility. African genetic diversity holds particular significance in understanding phylogeny, forensic investigations, and precision medicine. This study aims to investigate the control regions (HVR1 and HVR2) of mtDNA among a sample of 100 Hausa individuals from Nigeria. Buccal swabs were collected, and DNA extraction was performed performed using QiaGen DNA extraction kit according to manufacturer’s protocol, followed by quantification and purity assessment using Nanodrop One. PCR amplification was carried out using two primers for HVR1 and HVR2. The forward and reverse primers used for both the HVR1 and HVR2 were F-5’-TTA ACT CCA CCA TTA GCA CC-3’ and R-5’-CCT GAA GTA GGA ACC AGA TG-3’ and F-5' GGT CTA TCA CCC TAT TAA CCAC3' and R-5' CTG TTA AAA GTG CAT ACC GCCA3' respectively, followed by gel electrophoresis to ensure DNA quality and integrity. BIg dye terminator Sanger Type Sequencing was utilised for sequence analysis. Base calling and multiple alignments (ClustalW) were performed using BioEdit. AMOVA analysis was conducted using Arlequin, population admixture was assessed using STRUCTURE, phylogenetic tree construction utilised MEGA11, pairwise genetic comparisons were performed with SDT, and haplotype networks were created using PopArt and tcs. Of the total 100 individuals, 93 and 94 successful sequences were generated based on HVR and HVR2 primers respectively. The findings revealed significant within-population genetic variation based on AMOVA analysis in both HVR1 and HVR2, the within population variance was estimated at 99.69% and 96.69% in HVR1 and HVR2 respectively. The population admixture analysis revealed varying degrees of population subgrouping depending on the number of simulation runs. The phylogenetic tree and haplotype network analyses demonstrated complex genetic diversity among the Hausa iv population. The results underscore the importance of considering population-specific genetic markers for forensic investigations and population genetics studies in Nigeria. In addition, we downloaded the mitogenome sequences from the NCBI database of different global populations in order to make comparison with our genetic data. We downloaded from Southern Africa (Angola), Oceania (New Zealand) Tokelau population, South Asia (west Indian Caste), Central Europe (Switzerland), South America (Paraguay) and North America (Canada, Newfoundland) with accession numbers MF3812871-MF3813061, MT9282831-MT9282971, MK0439671-MK0439862, MT0790191-MT0790371, MH9818231-MH9818421 and MF5887941-MF5888111 respectively. We used Arlequin to conduct AMOVA and use the FST values generated to make a pairwise identity matrix between the populations using R statistical tool, SDT was used to make pairwise comparison of individual sequences, and STRUCTURE to make ancestral admixture within and between the population across the continents. We used 15-20 sequences from each of the continental populations. Markov Chain steps were set at 10,000, and a burn-in length of 10,000 was used with K replication values set at 6, and 3 iterations (Evanno et al., 2005). To determine which of the eighteen runs was best suited for inferring ancestral relationships among the study populations, a structure harvester was used (Earl & vonHoldt, 2012) The AMOVA result based on selected global populations across the continent indicated that the populations can be distinguished from one another with relative certainty based on their genetic sequence. More than 90% of the genetic variation is accounted for among the population with only a less than 10% within population variation. This has indicated that there is genetic variation between populations from Nigeria, Switzerland, New Zealand, West India, Angola, Paraguay and Canada. The overall FST value of above 0.9 indicated strong genetic diversity among the study population, thus inferring genetic variability. In addition, individual FST values that were used to generate a colour-coded matrix indicated genetic distinctiveness of the Nigerian population from the rest of the v world based on the mtDNA HVR2 data. However, it can be observed that statistical significance was only observed between Nigerian and Canadian population. Sequence Demarcation Tool indicated a pairwise individual genetic distance between the global population with the Nigerian population maintaining a high genetic diversity and distinctiveness from the rest of the population. However, the Angolan population that we assumed to show relationship with the Nigerian population had demonstrated a more genetic relatedness with the rest of the population. This can be attributed to mixed genetic traits between the Angolan and Portuguese populations that are still present in the country even after independence from the Portuguese colonisation. Based on the SDT figure, the South and North American population are furthest from the West African population, it is interesting that the Central European populations are placed closer to the West African populations. In our effort to determine shared ancestry between the West African and other continental populations, we observed a distinct ancestry of the Nigerian Hausa population from the rest of the world. The targeted Hausa population in our study were selected based on their historical importance in the Hausa kingdom. The targeted Hausa population were from ancient Hausa cities which could be the reason for such genetic uniqueness. The population has further elucidated the much reported high genetic diversity of the African population. This has further indicated the relevance of this population for forensic genetics. In conclusion, this study provides insights into the genetic diversity and structure of the Hausa population in Nigeria, as inferred from the analysis of mtDNA control regions. The identified patterns contribute to our understanding of the population's evolutionary history and can aid in forensic investigations and precision medicine approaches. Further research and expanded sampling are recommended to enhance the accuracy and robustness of population genetic studies in the region. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Galgotias University | en_US |
dc.subject | PhD Thesis | en_US |
dc.subject | FORENSIC SCIENCE | en_US |
dc.subject | GENETIC DIVERSITY | en_US |
dc.subject | HAUSA POPULATION | en_US |
dc.subject | FORENSIC CHARACTERISATION | en_US |
dc.title | MATRILINEAL GENETIC DIVERSITY AND FORENSIC CHARACTERISATION OF HAUSA POPULATION IN NIGERIA | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
FORENSIC SCIENCE [14]